This guitar is a close model of an 1834 Panormo that I did extensive repairs on last year. My post from 7/9/14 describes that work. While the guitar was in my shop I was able to study it in detail and that provided the impetus to build a model.
The guitar's dimensions:
string length 635mm
body length 452mm
upper bout width 228mm
waist width 177mm
lower bout 286mm
maximum rib depth 92mm (tail)
This show a later stage of construction but provides a convenient talking point |
Next I thinned the spruce top to 2.6 - 2.5mm through the center and tapered the edges at the bouts to 2.3 - 2.22mm.
The rosette is a double ring; a thin three band outer ring and a wider, multi-band inner ring composed of alternating bands of kingwood and holly wood.
Here's the finished rose at a later stage of construction. The sound hole opening is 86mm wide while the outer ring is 137mm. The thin light and dark rings are each .6mm thick.
This photo shows how the fan struts glued in place. The seven struts (seen in a previous photo) are positioned in the typical fashion favoured by Panormo; bunched near the harmonic bar then flaring out to the bottom and sides of the lower bouts. I glue them all at once by using foam and wood gluing cauls to force the bars and soundboard into the concavity. Once the glue dries the lower half of the soundboard is permanently domed.
Here the cauls are laid out in order showing the depressions left from clamping. I like this method because uniform pressure is applied over the length of the struts and they are all glued at the same time.
The neck and heel assembly is a key in the construction of this guitar and others that are built on a solera. The heel block and slipper foot provide structural rigidity and an uninterrupted acoustical pathway from the nut into the heart of the guitar.
Although this style of neck assembly can be cut from a single block of wood Panormo made the heel and slipper out of a single block and glued it to the neck piece with a long scarf joint. Because the scarf runs at a shallow angle (see the second photo down) there is a much larger gluing surface and therefore a stronger joint than would otherwise be the case.
Here's a close up of the original guitar with the scarf joint labeled.
Note that the neck piece (bottom of photo) continues well past the heel and is left square on the end. Glued to the soundboard it provides support for the top and fingerboard at a critical location and helps to produce strong clear notes in the upper register.
The slipper foot (top of photo) is rounded and glued to the back. It provides rigidity in the transition from the neck to the body.
Original 1834 head |
Panormo's peg head design has a simple elegance that I admire. It is constructed from a single block of maple without a capping. The curve at the top of the string slots match the curve of the head and the long broad ramps are accented by the tapered center piece and the finely shaped edges that terminate at the nut.
This design necessitates a blind V-joint so as to not interrupt the simplicity of the face.
I laid out the design in pencil, drilled a very small hole at the point of the V and using a x-acto saw carefully made the two side cuts using the hole as an exit point for the end of the saw.
I then chiseled away the waste portion that left a rough surface since the bottom of the V angled up against the grain. This was smoothed with a file that I re-shaped for specifically for this purpose.
Peghead string slots are always a lot of work, more so using non-speciality tools. Here I drilled dozens of small holes on the waste side of the prescribed line and then finished by cutting away the intervening material.
To finish the surfaces I fitted temporary edge pieces to the peghead stock to make the slots parallel to my bench. I also made two corresponding supports for the file handle that were parallel to the slot depending on its orientation. Progress was fairly rapid.
The string ramps are long but fairly shallow. They are cut below the top surface even at the nut making for a delicate rounded edge at this point.
There's lots more work to do and I'll describe that in one or two future posts.
All photos by the author.
Hi
ReplyDeleteThat's great information. I'm also working on a replica at the moment and i'm wondering about the indicated thickness of both the top and the back. 2.5mm seems to be very stiff for a body that small. Usually guitars of theat epoch have the soundboard much thinner. Also the guitar has a five fan brace and that will add to the stiffness too. I've already built a similar replica of a 1830 Juan Moreno and the top is too stiff with a 2mm thickness. So i'm thinking about going quite a bit thinner on my Panormo in order to avoid excess stiffness of the top.
Accoring to the blueprint that i have the soundboard is entirely flat. However the soundboard itself should not be built entirely flat in my opinion.
ReplyDelete